ArXiv to ban authors for one year if AI does all the work
Original: Research repository ArXiv will ban authors for a year if they let AI do all the work
Why This Matters
Sets precedent for academic integrity standards in AI-assisted research
Research repository ArXiv announced it will impose one-year bans on authors who submit papers with clear evidence they didn't verify AI-generated content. The policy targets careless LLM use including hallucinated references and unverified AI output.
ArXiv, the widely-used preprint repository, is cracking down on careless use of large language models in scientific papers. Computer science section chair Thomas Dietterich announced authors will face one-year bans if submissions contain 'incontrovertible evidence' they didn't check LLM-generated results, such as hallucinated references or LLM comments. After the ban, authors must get papers accepted by peer-reviewed venues first. The policy isn't an outright LLM prohibition but requires authors take 'full responsibility' for all content regardless of how it's generated. ArXiv previously required first-time poster endorsements and is becoming an independent nonprofit to better address AI-generated content issues. The one-strike rule requires moderator flagging and section chair confirmation, with appeals allowed.